CAM5.3 simulations

1. Development runs: Standalone with climo SSTs

We anticipate that L18 will be the cam5_3 release.

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
L1	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.001	CAM5.2 (use non langrangian code) nsplit=5 qsplit=4 rpslit=0	w/ obs w/ FV 1d	This is the CAM5.2 release. The ne30 simulation is competitive with FV 1deg except for the stratocumulus deck
L2	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.002	use langrangian code for vertical advection nsplit=1 qsplit=4 rpslit=5 vert_remap_q_alg = 0	w/ obs w/ ne30 non-lagrangian w/ FV 1d	The langrangian code really helps with the stratocumulus deck. Basically the stratocumulus are quasi indistinguishable between ne30 and FV 1deg
L3	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.003	same as L2 + vert_remap_q_alg = 1	w/ L2
L4	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.004	same as L3 + vert_remap_q_alg = 2	w/ L3
L5	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.005	same as L3 + bug fix in "prim_advection_mod.F90"	w/ L3
L6	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.006	same as L5 + new topo 8xdel2 USGS-gtopo30_ne30np4_8xdel2-PFC-consistentSGH.nc	w/ L5
L7	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.007	same as L3 (vert_remap_q_alg = 0) + remap T (instead of vertical energy of total energy) + energy_fixer = 4	w/ obs w/ L3
L8	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.008	same as L7 (remap T) + vert_remap_q_alg = 2	w/ L7
L9	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.009	same as L8 + nu_top = 2.5e5->5.0e5	w/ L8
L10	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.010	same as L8 + nu_top = 2.5e5->1.0e5	w/ L8
L11	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.011	same as L8 + nsplit=5 + rsplit=1	w/ L8
L12	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.012	New implementaion of lagrangian code with - remap T (not TE) - apply limiter to U,V in vertical remap - apply nu_top dissipation to U,V,T,dp Use (namelist variables different from default): nsplit=1 qsplit=4 rpslit=5 nu_p = 1.e15 vert_remap_q_alg = 0	w/ obs w/ L1 w/ L2
L13	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.013	Same as L12 vert_remap_q_alg = 1	w/ obs w/ L12
L14	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.014	Same as L12 vert_remap_q_alg = 2	w/ obs w/ L12
L15	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.015	Same as L13 + energy_fixer = 4 This configuration uses the new implementation of lagrangian code with - remap T (instead of Total Energy) - apply limiter to U,V in vertical remap - apply nu_top dissipation to U,V,T,dp Use: nsplit=1 qsplit=4 rpslit=5 nu_p = 1.e15	w/ obs w/ FV 1deg w/ L2 w/ L13
L16	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.016	Same as L15 + bugfix in hyperviscosity code	w/ obs w/ FV 1deg w/ L1 (CAM5.2: eulerian advection) w/ L2 (lagrangian advection as showed at AMWG in Feb) w/ L15
L17	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.017	Same as L16 + new initial condition (with conservative interpolation of the FV cami file on se grid)	w/ obs w/ L16	Fix problem in surface pressure
L18	f.e11.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.vert-adv.018	Same as L17 + bugfix to update specific humidity used to compute virtual temperature every dynamic timesetp	w/ L17	bug in the vertically lagrangian code's computation of T_v: the specific humidity used in the dynamics to compute the virtual temperature is not updated during the 30min lagrangian steps. So the wet contribution to T_v is using the specific humidity from the end of the last physics update, instead of updating it every 6min after each tracer timestep.

2. Standalone CAM with climo SSTs

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
M1	f.e12.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.climosst.001	Climo SSTs(2000)	w/ obs w/ FV 1d
M2	f.e12.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.climosst_pia.001	Climo SSTs(2000) +1850 aerosols (to compute AIE)	w/ obs w/ f.e12.F2000C5.ne30_ne30.climosst.001

3. AMIP type runs

30 levels

Case ID

Casename

Description

Diagnostics

Comments

AA1

f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L30.001

AMIP type run

w/ obs

Problem with SSTs (compset is using climo SSTs instead of AMIP)

AA2

f.e12.FAMIPC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L30.001

AMIP type run

w/ obs
w/ FV 1d
variability

variablity (FV 1d)

60 levels

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
AB1	f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L60.001	AMIP type run with L60 (Byron configuration)	w/ obs w/ L30 w/ Yaga's L60	Problem with SSTs (compset is using climo SSTs instead of AMIP)
AB2	f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L60.002	AMIP type run with L60 (Byron configuration) +a2l = 30-> 10	w/ obs w/ L30 w/ AB1	Problem with SSTs (compset is using climo SSTs instead of AMIP)
AB3	f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L60.003	AMIP type run with L60 (Byron configuration) +a2l = 30-> 10 + rhminl=0.8975->0.8850	w/ obs w/ L30 w/ Yaga's L60	Problem with SSTs (compset is using climo SSTs instead of AMIP)
AB4	f.e12.FAMIPC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L60.003	AMIP type run with L60 (Byron configuration) +a2l = 30-> 10 + rhminl=0.8975->0.8850	w/ obs w/ L30 w/ Yaga's L60 variability

120 levels

Case ID

Casename

Description

Diagnostics

Comments

AC1

f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L120.001

AMIP type run with L120
+a2l = 30-> 10
+ rhminl=0.8975->0.8850

w/ obs
w/ L60
w/ L30

We start with the L60 tuning:
a2l = 30-> 10
rhminl=0.8975->0.8850

Crashes after 3 months.
"(shr_sys_abort) ERROR: negative layer thickness.
timestep or remap time too large"

+> we try to decrease dymanics timstep

AC2

f.e12.F1850PDC5.ne30_ne30.amip_L120.002

AMIP type run with L120
+a2l = 30-> 10
+ rhminl=0.8975->0.8850
+ se_nsplit=2
+ rsplit=3
+ qsplit=4

w/ obs
w/ L60
w/ L30

### Default:
se_nsplit = 1
rsplit=5
qsplit=4
=> which yields:
dt_remap = dt/se_nsplit=1800
dt_tracer = dt_remap/rsplit=360
dt_dyn = dt_dyn/qsplit=90

### Setting recommended by peter
se_nsplit=2
rsplit=3
qsplit=4
=> which yields:
dt_remap=900
dt_tracer=300
dt_dyn=75

4. Coupled runs (SE)

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
Large Ens	b.e11.B1850C5CN.f09_g16.005	Large ensemble	w./ obs RESTOM TS timeseries ocn diags
N002	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.002	Coupled run with out-of the box tuning rhimnl = 0.8975 Start from spinup ocean of large-ensemble at year 402	w/ obs w/ cesm-cam5.2 w/ FV 1d (138j) w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) timeseries ocn timseries ocn mean diags
N003	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.003	Same as N002 rhminl = 0.8975 -> 0.8850 (what we need to be balanced in SE)	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (138j) timeseries
N005	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.005	Same as N002 rhminl = 0.8975 -> 0.8875	w/ obs w/ cesm-cam5.2 w/ FV 1d (138j) w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) timeseries
N006	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.006	Same as N002 rhminl = 0.8975 -> 0.8925 (same value as large-ensemble)	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (138j) w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ FV 1d (F2 - see below) timeseries ocean diags
N010	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.010	Same as N006 dp1 = 0.10->0.14	w/obs w/ control (N4) timeseries
N012	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.012	Same as N006 + rpen = 5->10 (all tuning teh same than in large ensemble)	w/obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) timeseries ocn timeseries diags ocn mean diags ocn mean diags vs large ensemble sea-ice vs obs sea-ice vs large-ensemble land diags vs obs land diags vs large-ensemble
N013	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.013	Same as N006 + tms_orocnst = 1.0->2.0D0	w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N014	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.014	Same as N006 + old SE topo (smooth): USGS-gtopo30_0.9x1.25_smooth2000-100_ne30np4_c051027.nc	w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N015	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.015	Same as N006 + effgw_oro = 0.25	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N016	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.016	Same as N006 + hdsp(i) = 4.0_r8 * sgh(i)	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N017	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.017	Same as N006 + uwshcu_rpen = 5->8.0	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N018	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.018	Same as N006 + start from Levitus	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries ocn timseries
N019	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.019	Same as N006 + topo interpolated form FV-1d without smoothing	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006 timeseries
N021	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.021	Same as N012 + mapping files (blinear instead of native) atm2ocn_fmapname= '/glade/p/cesm/cseg/inputdata/cpl/gridmaps/ne30np4/ map_ne30np4_TO_gx1v6_aave.130522.nc' atm2ocn_smapname= '/glade/p/cesm/cseg/inputdata/cpl/gridmaps/ne30np4/ map_ne30np4_TO_gx1v6_blin.130522.nc' atm2ocn_vmapname= '/glade/p/cesm/cseg/inputdata/cpl/gridmaps/ne30np4/ map_ne30np4_TO_gx1v6_patc.130522.nc' ocn2atm_fmapname= '/glade/p/cesm/cseg/inputdata/cpl/gridmaps/gx1v6/ map_gx1v6_TO_ne30np4_aave.130522.nc' ocn2atm_smapname= '/glade/p/cesm/cseg/inputdata/cpl/gridmaps/gx1v6/ map_gx1v6_TO_ne30np4_aave.130522.nc'	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (timeseries) w/ N012 timeseries
N022	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.022	Out-of-the box starting from b.e11.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.vert-adv.001 Test impact of ocean spin up	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (timeseries) timeseries ocn timeseries
N023	b.e12.B1850C5CN.ne30_g16.control.023	Same as N012 + GW from WACCM	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (timeseries) w/ N012 timeseries

60 Levels

Case ID

Casename

Description

Diagnostics

Comments

Yaga's L60

60L_cesm1_2_beta08c_mg15_dcs400_rhminl1

Yaga's L60 coupled run

w/ obs
w/ F1d (large ensemble)
w/ lev30 (N012)

timseries

AMIP run ne120

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
Run at ne120	FAMIPC5.ne120.ys.tau60m.01	ne120 run to check of horizontal resolution impact on surface stress	w/ obs w/ FV 1d (large ensemble) w/ N006

5. Coupled runs (FV)

Case ID	Casename	Description	Diagnostics	Comments
F001	b.e12.B1850C5CN.f09_g16.control.001	Starting from Large-ensemble ta yr 402 rhminl = 0.8975	w/obs w/ Fv 1d (138j) w/ Fv 1d (large ensemble) timeseries
F002	b.e12.B1850C5CN.f09_g16.control.002	Same as F001 rhminl = 0.8975 -> 0.8925 (same value as large-ensemble)	w/obs w/ Fv 1d (138j) w/ Fv 1d (large ensemble) timeseries ocn diags
F003	b.e12.B1850C5CN.f09_g16.control.003	Same as F002 + WACCM ozone (same ozone as large-ensemble)	w/ obs timeseries
F004	b.e12.B1850C5CN.f09_g16.control.004	Same as F002 + topo = fv0.9x1.25-default-PHIS-new-SGH-SGH30.nc	w/ obs w/ F002 timeseries